Should activists work to reduce the suffering of billions of chickens ?
Q. Should activists work to reduce the suffering of billions of chickens and other animals who will never live to see a vegan world, or is such work counterproductive a moral betrayal of animals?
Asked by Philkillens Girl. - Fri Sep 19 07:45:11 2008 - - 15 Answers - 0 Comments

A. I wouldn't think so. Where I live(the south), many people enjoy eating fried chicken from places like KFC.
Answered by Mike M. - Fri Sep 19 10:53:48 2008

How do you find the activities of the human rights activists?
Q. Do you feel comfortable with the cry for mercy for proven criminals and terrorists by so called HR activists and sometimes the HR commisions as well.. What about the victims of the criminals - dont they have a right to live their lives..?
Asked by Bala - Tue Oct 14 05:26:34 2008 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Most of them are paranoid. They do not take up genuine issues but only those that give them some advertisement and make useless noise.
Answered by krishnamoorthynagarajan - Tue Oct 14 05:32:52 2008

If you heard animal activists raided a mink ranch what would you say?
Q. These activists raided a ranch and in the process animals were killed. I need to write 2 essays on this. 1 for the activists and 1 against. I need more reasons why they shouldn't have done the raid and why they shouldn't feel so strongly in protecting animals.. even though they are not necessarily being hurt. like milking a cow for instance.
Asked by PRiNCESS - Mon Feb 23 23:16:17 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments

A. where the heck are these massive mink killing enterprises? i dont have a problem w/ fur but if a person is stupid enough to wear a mink coat, they get doused w/blood. nobody wears fur coats anymore so what would be protested against. this sounds like something an activist might be doing in the 60s
Answered by BIGGLES FORGOT HIS GOAT LEGGINGS - Mon Feb 23 23:28:38 2009

Illegal immigrant rights activists should they direct their energy down Mexico way?
Q. Illegal immigrant rights activists should they direct their energy down Mexico way? Seriously, why aren t they? Why are they not rioting in the streets of Mexico rallying for immigrants rights?
Asked by Untied States Of Latina - Fri Aug 17 15:29:32 2007 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Because we make it too easy for them to live here, illegally, and get everything for nothing. If we start enforcing the immigration laws, add some hefty penalties ( like if you are caught here even once illegally, you are permanently disqualified from applying for American citizenship) and actually build the wall, they would be forced to try to make something of their own land.
Answered by HLBellevino - Fri Aug 17 15:52:48 2007

Are animal activists running out of things to do?
Q. A polar bear in a german zoo has rejected and abandoned her cub, the zoo decided to raise the cub on their own. The animal activists have criticized them by saying that "in the wild the cub would be left to die and thats what the zoo should do." According to the activists the zoo is getting in the way of nature. I thought avtivists were supposed to care about an animals well being. Are they running out of things to do? Inquiring minds want to know.
Asked by Dangerous Danny - Thu Mar 22 10:24:05 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Lets see a cub that is rejected by his mother and will get far better medical treatment and food and care than it would ever in the wild. Have a longer healthier life. Also get attention which all animals love. Is now a bad thing. Anytime I have doubts about animal rights actives being too far gone they come along like this story and remove all doubt. Tonight I think I am going to have lamb chops in their honor.
Answered by kveryeffective - Thu Mar 22 10:35:53 2007

Can You Imagine A World Where Muslim Activists Finally Met All Of Their Goals?
Q. ...Can you ?...Imagine...Now, mankind is back in the 13th century...How far will the "activists" have to travel now in order to spread their hatered ?
Asked by "PC ANTAGONIST" - Fri Nov 28 15:00:40 2008 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Any religion has good and bad followers. Islam forbids violence. We can imagine a world where pops governed the middle age europe. But are all christians incubus people???
Answered by Iran - Fri Nov 28 15:21:13 2008

Is there any blog for the NGO activists?
Q. I personally experienced many cases of unethical activities of NGO authorities and patrons ( like monitory manipulation ,exploitation of the stake-holders as well as activists etc.).is there any solidarity space where I can share my experiences .any body would like to...?
Asked by Amitumi 9 - Tue Apr 22 07:38:11 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments

A. If you want to start a blog, then start one. There are many free blog services out there -- a search on Google will find you several. You will need to include names of the NGOs you think are engaged in unethical activities, what you yourself have actually witnessed (not just something you've heard about, but something you can prove), dates of each unethical activity you have witnessed or that you can prove, your full name (it would be unethical on your part not to be transparent about who you are), and a place for these organizations to respond to your accusations.
Answered by Jayne says READ MORE BOOKS - Tue Apr 22 07:53:04 2008

Who are some memorable and famous animal activists?
Q. I need to know some memorable animal activists who really made a change for animals like animal rights and stuff. ASAP i dont need famous people...i need people who have really made a diffrence for animals in the past
Asked by gcgirl4evermore - Sun Dec 2 18:53:16 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Bob Barker, Betty White.
Answered by tidbit - Sun Dec 2 19:04:04 2007

What makes extreme animal activists extreme?
Q. I mean extreme activists as in they make bomb threats, bomb places that test on animals, etc.. What makes you think that they are extreme, besides being violent in their ways to save the animals?
Asked by Hoopies - Sun Nov 25 23:40:23 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Demographics show most animal activists come from a very privileged class of society (old money). Their upbringing in an ivory tower existence causes them to see the poorer classes of people as little better than animals. They have no sense of respect for the rest of human life, which they see as a species that has gone bad, and should be eliminated. They feel as the upper class they can pass judgment on the rest of us without a twinge of conscience. The only lower classes they can tolerate are their entourage of toadies who support their beliefs unquestioning. They represent one of the worst cases of economic elitism trampling on the rights of the lower classes in promoting their whimsical cause.
Answered by Robin Runesinger - Sun Nov 25 23:49:42 2007

Why are anti adoption activists so focussed on converting adoptees?
Q. I understand that you see things differently and that you do indeed feel pain. I do not understand why you want to convert those who are perfectly perfectly fine . Are we not to move towards contentment in life not away from it? Why are you trying to spread you pain to others who are just fine. Why?! It saddens me that young adoptees will stumble here and be brainwashed. You are not correct. I read all the time that adoptees are in denial or a fog or drinking cool aid and this is simply not true!!
Asked by O-Ollie - Sat Jan 24 13:43:07 2009 - - 19 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Wow I have never heard of anti-adotion activists! Why would someone do that? Legislate or rally against adoption? thats sick.
Answered by Desiree - Sat Jan 24 14:52:42 2009

What are Sharpton and other upitty black activists saying now that Vick plead guilty?
Q. Are they still defending Vick and blaming whitey or society? I guess the old saying is true. You can take take the black out of the hood, but not the hood out of the black. There is NOTHING racist about this question. Sharpton and friends brought race into the issue defending Vick because he is black. I would say that insisting that because Vick is black, he could not be guilty is being upitty. If sharpton and friends knew their place, and acted like real people, this would not be an issue. But assuming he is guilty BECAUSE he is black has a much higher percentage of being correct then assuming he is not. you may not like that, but is the truth.
Asked by d j - Mon Aug 20 14:42:22 2007 - - 9 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Al is too busy having his hair permed to comment. Stand by, please...
Answered by Noone i - Mon Aug 20 14:47:36 2007

Why do people make fun of us animal activists?
Q. How would you feel if I came and ate your cat or dog or whatever (hamster,etc.)? Then you will see that animals have feelings and souls like us. If i get through to one person on here, my mind will be at ease. Peace to my brothers and siters! sisters! Opps, lol! All of yall disgust me. Red, we dont need to eat animals to survive...thats why we are more evolved than animals..they dont know any better...if i can consult a wolve not to eat meat i would..but hes too dumb.
Asked by whenrainbowscry - Thu Nov 9 13:27:07 2006 - - 20 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Excellent question. I believe that it is mostly due to the fact that they know in their hearts what is right, but the problem is that they cannot accomplish or even attempt what is right, so they resort to feeling threatened and using insults to cover up their feelings and better cope with guilt. Humans were born with emotions that include compassion, some more than others, but they just need to learn to use it beyond the level of only humans. That is why I consider, to a degree, the trait of compassion as a skill. For some people, it takes many years to open up their eyes and learn that all animals are equal (yes, humans are considered to be animals). As a result of our evolution, we were inborn with intelligence and the ability to… [cont.]
Answered by housesoftheholy90 - Thu Nov 9 16:40:21 2006

Can you name Three environmental activists?
Q. I am working on my Girl Scout silver award, on the badge Eco Action. I have to identify three past or present environmental activists. Right now I only have two, Al Gore and Greenpeace. If you could give me some more i would really appriciate it!
Asked by estersue13 - Wed Jun 24 19:08:55 2009 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments

A. 1. John Muir. He founded the Sierra Club and helped begin the conservation movement in the U.S. Also, he helped convince the U.S. government to purchase and preserve forever Yosemite. 2. Steve Irwin - Brought public attention to all types of animals, their uniqueness, and the need to conserve them. 3. Dian Fossey - Helped create a national park for the preservation of Mountain Gorillas which prior to this had very little if any protection and were being wiped out. Fought to protect the gorillas in any way she could and ended up giver her life for them when she was killed by poachers. 4. Rachel Carson - Wrote the book Silent Spring about the dangers of chemical pesticides to our environment and especially DDT. Her book helped… [cont.]
Answered by Emil K. - Fri Jun 26 18:51:57 2009

Is it legal to shoot back to the animal rights activists, who destroy the fur coat?
Q. Basically it is totally legal to protect your life and property with the gun. If some lunatic throws something at you targeting the fur coat, is it legal to shoot back. Thing is if someone throws something at you, how do you know what is it? Is it deadly? It is normal reaction to protect yourself.
Asked by superduke85 - Sat Dec 6 16:49:12 2008 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments

A. So if someone harms a fur coat made of 50 animals that were neglected, tortured, and killed for mere greed and pride, that YOU payed to have done to them for fashion, you think you should be able to kill or critically injure that person? Well, you're all about killing and harming for fashion aren't you? How selfish can someone get...
Answered by animalia_libero - Tue Dec 9 12:40:41 2008

How does the world activists make people like Julio Diaz, owner of Animal Control Solutions, accountable?
Q. If you have not read of the inhumane killings of this man in Puerto Rico, then I suggest a quick search in the news. After that, please let me know what can be done (from a different country) to stop such terrible monsterous practices.
Asked by Too Curious - Wed Nov 14 23:52:10 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments

A. If there's animal abuse then PETA is usually interested. They're the largest animal rights protection organization in the world.
Answered by sunshine25 - Sat Nov 17 09:12:55 2007

Why do gay rights activists insist on comparing their situation to the Civil Rights Movement?
Q. Yes, they are fighting for rights, but they have not gone through segregation, and as much discrimination. There have never been any law abiding "No gays allowed" signs on any buildings. The movements are very different.
Asked by Byron, The Redeemer - Sun Jan 18 01:36:16 2009 - - 12 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Civil rights are rooted in moral authority, while homosexual rights are rooted in the lack of moral restraint. Trying to undo the damage of years of a race of people in slavery was the right thing to do, whereas trying to change laws solely because of the decisions of a group of people is not the right thing. According to the Constitution, all men have God-given rights. It was because of these rights Martin Luther King Jr. and others fought for freedom. The Constitution guaranteed us rights to vote, rights to buy property. It guaranteed us certain unalienable rights. If I define marriage as between a man and a woman. Not because I hate gays, but because I believe that traditionally that's how marriage has been defined. I believe that… [cont.]
Answered by DontTellMeWhatToThink - Sun Jan 18 02:30:29 2009

How much more screaming by pro-life activists will it take before Roe V. Wade is finally overturned?
Q. How much interrupting and yelling does it take to result in a Supreme Court decision being overturned? We must be getting close. Does it it have to do with the amount of time the screaming is sustained? The decibel level? Both? I am not a Constitutional scholar so any information would be appreciated.
Asked by Culture Warrior - Wed Jul 15 19:20:12 2009 - - 24 Answers - 0 Comments

A. The leaders of the pro-life movement, I don't think they really even -want- Roe v. Wade to be overturned. They just want something to scream about, a rope to lead fundamentalist Christians around by the nose. President Reagan promised to propose a constitutional amendment, no less, to declare the preborn 'human beings'. He never even really tried. Between Reagan and two Bushes SEVEN nomination were made to the Supreme Court, each one being promised to the Christian Right to be the single swing-vote needed to overturn Roe v. Wade. But it never happened. Finally Bush had six whole years with a Republican Congress and probably the most Christian-friendly Supreme Court in American History. And what did they do? Zip. Zero. Nada. In all… [cont.]
Answered by It's That Guy - Wed Jul 15 19:31:13 2009

Are there any good websites/organizations that coordinate the efforts of anti-tax activists?
Q. Not just one-off stuff like the tea parties, but affecting long term change.
Asked by Willis Jeffords - Mon Jul 20 22:36:19 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments

What would pro-abortion activists say if they realized magaret sanger was a racist eugenist?
Q. And no, margaret sanger wasn't a racist who merely happened to promote abortion by chance. She promoted it because she was a racist who wanted to eliminate undesirables like the poor. Abortion today is just a reverse psychology version of eugenics masquerading as "womens' rights" and "liberalism". Instead of saying that they want to eliminate the poor, abortion activists say that they are trying to solve poverty by reducing the birth rate of the poor. And instead of it being racist to support abortion, it's now "racist" not to support abortion. Of course you may also be able to reduce poverty simply by elimination of the population of poor people, but it's a pretty twisted way of doing it, because it's basically saying that some people's [cont.]
Asked by John R - Sat Apr 14 23:28:14 2007 - - 21 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Why do you think they always have a black woman to head up Planned Parenthood? Yes, Margaret Sanger was very *much* a racist eugencist (as was Allan Guttmacher)! By hiding their *real* agenda, which was to eliminate poor people - *especially* Negro/black/Afro-American ones - they started by fighting for the elimination of laws against contraception means and devices, then offering any birth control means they could acquire to poor people, especially poor black girls and women, at low or no cost! Planned Parenthood and NARAL, and their ilk, then launched their attack against poor girls' and women's babies already conceived - *especially* black ones. Planned Parenthood finally managed to dupe a poor, divorced, woman to become Jane Roe… [cont.]
Answered by trebor namyl hcaeb - Sun Apr 15 01:01:18 2007

How come Gwen Stefani calls her self a ho in that one song and no activists are in up roar?
Q. You know that one song where she says: 'take a chance you stupid ho' Shouldn't someone call for her to resign like they did with Imus?
Asked by Joe Below - Thu Oct 18 13:59:14 2007 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Have you ever thought that maybe, just maybe she is a stupid ho?
Answered by laura seeks the Kwisatz Haderach - Thu Oct 18 14:23:38 2007